Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF
| United States Patent Application |
20110131874
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
Verdree; Vera T.
;   et al.
|
June 9, 2011
|
METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF HEAT TRANSFER IN A COAL FIRED
FURNACE
Abstract
An additive having as components, at least three metal oxides selected
from iron, manganese, cobalt, and copper oxide, may be added to coal to
reduce the brightness of ash produced therewith. Further, the additive
serves to increase the heat transfer efficiency of furnaces.
| Inventors: |
Verdree; Vera T.; (Sugar Land, TX)
; Walther; Leonard E.; (Russellville, KY)
|
| Assignee: |
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Houston
TX
|
| Serial No.:
|
956370 |
| Series Code:
|
12
|
| Filed:
|
November 30, 2010 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
44/620 |
| Class at Publication: |
44/620 |
| International Class: |
C10L 5/44 20060101 C10L005/44 |
Claims
1. A process for treating coal to increase heat transfer efficiency in
coal burning furnaces comprising: contacting the coal with an additive
prior to or concurrent with combustion of the coal wherein: the additive
functions to increase radiant heat adsorption of coal ash as compared
with an otherwise identical process absent the additive; and the additive
does not include a fluxing agent.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the additive is a pigment comprising at
least 3 oxides selected from Fe, Cu, Co, and Mn oxides.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein the pigment comprises Fe, Cu and Mn
oxides.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the pigment comprises from about 15 to
about 60% by weight (as metal) copper oxide; from about 20 to about 70%
by weight (as metal) manganese oxide; and from about 5 to about 30% by
weight (as metal) iron oxide.
5. The process of claim 4 wherein the pigment comprises from about 25 to
about 45% by weight (as metal) copper oxide; from about 35 to about 60%
by weight (as metal) manganese oxide; and from about 10 to about 25% by
weight (as metal) iron oxide.
6. The process of claim 2 wherein the pigment comprises Fe, Cu and Co
oxides.
7. The process of claim 6 wherein the pigment comprises from about 15 to
about 60% by weight (as metal) copper oxide; from about 20 to about 70%
by weight (as metal) cobalt oxide; and from about 5 to about 30% by
weight (as metal) iron oxide.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein the pigment comprises from about 25 to
about 45% by weight (as metal) copper oxide; from about 35 to about 60%
by weight (as metal) cobalt oxide; and from about 10 to about 25% by
weight (as metal) iron oxide.
9. The process of claim 1 wherein the additive is a pigment comprising
Fe, Cu, Co, and Mn oxides.
10. The process of claim 9 wherein the pigment comprises from about 15 to
about 60% by weight (as metal) copper oxide; from about 20 to about 70%
by weight (as metal) manganese oxide; from about XX to about YY % by
weight (as metal) cobalt; and from about 5 to about 30% by weight (as
metal) iron oxide.
11. The process of claim 10 wherein the pigment comprises from about 25
to about 45% by weight (as metal) copper oxide; from about 35 to about
60% by weight (as metal) manganese oxide; from about XX2 to about YY2% by
weight (as metal) cobalt; and from about 10 to about 25% by weight (as
metal) iron oxide.
12. The process of claim 1 wherein the additive is introduced to the coal
prior to combustion.
13. The process of claim 12 wherein the additive is sprayed onto the
coal.
14. The process of claim 13 wherein the process further comprises
pulverizing the coal, and the additive is sprayed onto the coal prior to
pulverizing.
15. The process of claim 13 wherein the process further comprises
pulverizing the coal, and the additive is sprayed onto the coal after or
concurrently with pulverization.
16. The process of claim 12 wherein the additive is admixed with the coal
as a solid.
17. The process of claim 16 wherein the additive is admixed with the coal
prior to or concurrently with pulverization.
18. The process of claim 1 wherein the additive is introduced to the coal
concurrently with combustion.
19. The process of claim 19 wherein the additive is sprayed into the
furnace.
20. A process for treating coal to increase heat transfer efficiency in
coal burning furnaces comprising: contacting the coal with an additive
prior to or concurrent with combustion of the coal wherein: the additive
functions to increase radiant heat adsorption of coal ash; the additive
does not include a fluxing agent; and the additive is a pigment
comprising at least 3 oxides selected from Fe, Cu, Co, and Mn oxides.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent
application Ser. No. 61/267,712 filed Dec. 8, 2009 the disclosure of
which is incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates to coal fired furnace systems. The
present invention particularly relates to coal-fired furnaces including
systems for adding additives to coal.
[0004] 2. Background of the Art
[0005] Petrochemical plants, oil refineries, power generation stations,
and the like; all utilize furnaces for heat generation. For centuries,
man has relied upon the combustion of combustible materials, such as coal
and wood, to provide heat energy. One of the most common methods for
harnessing this heat energy is to use the heat energy to generate steam
or heat other types of fluids.
[0006] Over the years, different types of furnaces or boilers have been
developed for the combustion of coal, wood, and other combustible
materials. In the late 1940's and early 1950's, there was a large decline
in the demand for commercial and industrial solid fuel-fired systems due
to the wide-spread availability of relatively cheap oil and natural gas
sources. Thus, the oil and gas-fired systems substantially replaced the
coal-fired systems until the gas and oil petroleum-based fuels became
less plentiful during the 1970's. The petroleum shortage experienced
during the 1970's and the very high prices of the late 2000's have made
coal-fired and other solid fuel-fired systems very attractive once again.
[0007] In recent years, considerable emphasis has been given to solid fuel
research, particularly in the area of burning solid fuels such as coal
and wood without excessive pollutant emissions and with increased heat
transfer efficiency. As the costs of oil and gas continue to escalate,
the utilization of solid fuel systems (such as coal-fired systems) will
continue to increase.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] In one aspect, the invention is a process for treating coal to
increase heat transfer efficiency in coal burning furnaces comprising:
contacting the coal with an additive prior to or concurrent with
combustion of the coal wherein: the additive functions to increase
radiant heat adsorption of coal ash; and the additive does not include a
fluxing agent.
[0009] In another aspect, the invention is a process for treating coal to
increase heat transfer efficiency in coal burning furnaces including
contacting the coal with an additive wherein the additive is a pigment
comprising at least 3 oxides selected from Fe, Cu, Co, and Mn oxides.
BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing
executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application
publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon
request and payment of the necessary fee. The advantages and further
aspects of the disclosure will be readily appreciated by those of
ordinary skill in the art as the same becomes better understood by
reference to the following detailed description when considered in
conjunction with the accompanying figures:
[0011] FIG. 1 is a p
hotograph of ash treated with 0.01% additive;
[0012] FIG. 2 is a p
hotograph of ash treated with 0.02% additive;
[0013] FIG. 3 is a p
hotograph of ash treated with 0.05% additive; and
[0014] FIG. 4 is a p
hotograph of an untreated sample of ash.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0015] In one embodiment, the invention is a process for treating coal to
increase heat transfer efficiency in coal burning furnaces. One type of
such a furnace, the stoker-fired furnace, was developed to burn
relatively large particles of coal, up to about 1.5 inches in diameter.
Later, another type of furnace, the pulverized coal-fired furnace, was
developed for burning much smaller coal particles, e.g., where about 70%
of the coal particles pass through a 200 mesh screen. Pulverized
coal-fired furnaces have large steam generating capacities and are thus
typically used in steam generating installations where at least 500,000
pounds of steam per hour are required. For example, the electric power
generating industry has been one of the largest users of pulverized
coal-fired furnaces, since large amounts of steam are required for the
production of electric energy.
[0016] With either type of furnace, the coal added to the furnace combusts
to produce heat. In some furnaces, the coal that does not instantly
combust falls upon a grate on which the burning fuel bed resides. The
grate moves, in some embodiments, at a very slow rate, e.g., from about 5
to 40 feet per hour, and eventually dumps the combustion by-products
(namely, residual ash) into an ash pit or some other receptacle.
Alternatively, the grate may be stationary but have the capability of
being dumped at periodic intervals to remove the bed of accumulated ash.
In some furnaces, the burning fuel bed is sluiced out.
[0017] One reason for the popularity of the spreader-stoker-fired furnace
is its high superficial grate heat release rates of up to 750,000
BTU/hr-ft.sup.2 and its low inertia due to nearly instantaneous fuel
ignition upon increased firing rate. This high superficial grate heat
release is obtained because of the relatively uniform distribution of the
coal particles in the burning fuel bed on the grate, the relatively small
depth of the layer of coal particles on the grate, and the intense
combustion during the suspension phase above the burning fuel bed. The
low inertia allows the spreader-stoker-fired furnace to respond rapidly
to load fluctuations in steam demand, and hence in boiler load, which are
common in industrial applications.
[0018] In the practice of the method of the application, the coal to be
burned may be treated with an additive. In one embodiment, the additive
is a pigment including oxides of iron, copper, cobalt and manganese. This
pigment interacts with coal ash to darken the ash.
[0019] By darkening the coal ash, heat transfer is improved within the
furnace. While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that
radiant heat is more efficiently absorbed by the ash clinging to the
walls of the furnace when the ash is dark. Especially when that surface
is a heat exchanger tube, the radiant energy may be transferred to the
heat transfer medium along with the normal convected heat resulting in
more heat reaching the heat transfer medium and thereby improving the
efficiency of the furnace.
[0020] The additive of the disclosure does not include a fluxing agent.
For example, there is no need to add a fluxing agent such as a borate.
Fluxing agents in general and borate fluxing agents in specific are known
to those of ordinary skill in the art. One advantage of the additive of
the disclosure is that it stays with the ash without the need for a
fluxing agent. Other pigments, if not affixed to coal ash, may be
problematic. For example, some pigments may travel up the stack of a coal
furnace and cause opacity problems. Other pigments may present disposal
problems.
[0021] While the additive of the disclosure may be used with any type of
coal, it is desirably utilized with coal that has high levels of calcium.
Such coal produces a very light colored ash and even a very small amount
of additive may provide for a significant improvement in heat transfer
efficiency.
[0022] The additive of the invention is an inorganic pigment that includes
at least 3 of the oxides of copper, iron, cobalt, and manganese. In some
embodiments all 4 metals may be present. The additive may, in some
embodiments, have from about 15 to about 60% by weight (as metal) copper
oxide; from about 20 to about 70% by weight (as metal) manganese oxide;
from about 20 to about 70% by weight cobalt; and from about 5 to about
30% by weight (as metal) iron oxide. In other embodiments, the additive
may have from about 25 to about 45% by weight (as metal) copper oxide;
from about 35 to about 60% by weight (as metal) manganese oxide; from
about 35 to about 60% by weight (as metal) cobalt; and from about 10 to
about 25% by weight (as metal) iron oxide.
[0023] The additive may be added to coal or it may be added directly to a
furnace as coal is being fed as fuel. In one embodiment, the additive is
sprayed onto coal as a liquid prior to it being pulverized. In one such
embodiment, a nozzle is used to perform the spraying. In another
embodiment, the additive is sprayed onto coal as a liquid after it has
been pulverized. In still another embodiment, the additive is introduced
into coal as a solid. Another embodiment of the method of the disclosure
includes introducing the additive as a solid prior to the coal being
pulverized. The additive may be introduced into coal or a furnace using
any method known to be useful to those of ordinary skill in the art.
[0024] The methods of the disclosure may be used advantageously to improve
power plant operations. In some applications, more power may be produced
per unit of coal. In other applications, the need for removing soot from
the inside of a furnace may be reduced. In still other applications, both
of these advantages may be noted.
EXAMPLES
[0025] The following examples are provided to illustrate the present
invention. The examples are not intended to limit the scope of the
present invention and they should not be so interpreted. Amounts are in
weight parts or weight percentages unless otherwise indicated.
Example 1
[0026] An inorganic pigment including iron, manganese, and copper oxides;
available from the FERRO Corporation under the trade designation F-6331-2
is used to darken coal ash. A high calcium lignite coal is admixed with
the additive at a concentration of 0.01%. The ash is burned and then
scanned. The resulting scan is evaluated using an HSB (Hue, Saturation,
and Brightness) model. The HSB model represents points in an RGB color
model that attempt to describe perceptual color relationships more
accurately than RGB, while remaining computationally simple. HSB allows
colors to be interpreted as tints, tones and shades. By converting the
samples into this electronic color model it is possible to measure the
difference in actual brightness, while keeping hue and saturation
independent. The scan may be seen below in FIG. 1. The sample is measured
and has a brightness of 44%
Example 2
[0027] Example 1 is repeated substantially identically except that 0.02%
of additive is used. The scan may be seen below at FIG. 2. The brightness
is measured as 37%.
Example 3
[0028] Example 1 is repeated substantially identically except that 0.05%
of additive is used. The scan may be seen below at FIG. 3. The brightness
is measured as 27%.
Comparative Example
Control
[0029] Example 1 is repeated substantially identically except that no
additive is used. The scan may be seen below at FIG. 4. The brightness is
measured as 68%.
TABLE-US-00001
TABLE
Sample ID [Additive in wt. %] Brightness % % Change
Ex 1 0.01 44 35.3
Ex 2 0.02 37 45.6
Ex 3 0.05 27 60.3
Control -- 68 --
Hypothetical Example
[0030] A power plant driven by a coal fired furnace is operated using
untreated coal. Variables recorded during the operations include the rate
at which coal is introduced into the furnace, megawatts of power
produced, and the frequency of "soot-blows." This latter term refers to
the process where soot deposited on the furnace tubes is blown from the
furnace using a blower. After the power plant is operating at a steady
load, the additive of Example 1 is introduced on to the coal being fed
into the furnace by spraying a solution/dispersion of the additive onto
the coal. After the introduction of the additive into the furnace, and
allowing the power plant to return to operation at a steady load, it is
noted that more megawatts of power is produced per unit of coal, and
fewer soot-blows are required per shift.
* * * * *