Easy To Use Patents Search & Patent Lawyer Directory

At Patents you can conduct a Patent Search, File a Patent Application, find a Patent Attorney, or search available technology through our Patent Exchange. Patents are available using simple keyword or date criteria. If you are looking to hire a patent attorney, you've come to the right place. Protect your idea and hire a patent lawyer.


Search All Patents:



  This Patent May Be For Sale or Lease. Contact Us

  Is This Your Patent? Claim This Patent Now.



Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF




United States Patent 8,043,336
Taylor October 25, 2011

Posterior vertebral support assembly

Abstract

The invention concerns an assembly (1) comprising an interspinous wedge (5) configured to be inserted between the spinous processes (9) of two vertebrae (2) to be treated, whereof at least one zone designed to be placed between the spinous processes of the vertebrae is made of an elastically deformable material. The assembly (1) further comprises: two compressive lateral elements (6), designed to be placed on either side of the wedge (5) in the longitudinal direction, said compressive lateral elements (6) being deformable between releasing positions, wherein they are relatively spaced apart from the wedge (5) in the transverse direction, and compressive positions, wherein they are relatively close to the wedge (5) in the transverse direction; and two lateral transmission elements (7), placed between the compressive lateral elements (6) and the wedge (5), configured to press against the wedge (5) in the transverse direction thereof, at the interspinous zone (10) of the wedge (5).


Inventors: Taylor; Jean (Cannes, FR)
Assignee: Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. (Warsaw, IN)
Appl. No.: 12/691,270
Filed: January 21, 2010


Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application NumberFiling DatePatent NumberIssue Date
105272517776069
PCT/FR03/02635Sep., 2003

Foreign Application Priority Data

Sep 10, 2002 [FR] 02 11189

Current U.S. Class: 606/249
Current International Class: A61B 17/70 (20060101)
Field of Search: 606/248,249

References Cited

U.S. Patent Documents
2677369 May 1954 Knowles
3648691 March 1972 Lumb et al.
4003376 January 1977 McKay et al.
4011602 March 1977 Rybicki et al.
4257409 March 1981 Bacal et al.
4448191 May 1984 Rodnyansky et al.
4554914 November 1985 Kapp et al.
4570618 February 1986 Wu
4573454 March 1986 Hoffman
4604995 August 1986 Stephens et al.
4643174 February 1987 Horiuchi
4643178 February 1987 Nasatari et al.
4686970 August 1987 Dove et al.
4776851 October 1988 Bruchman et al.
4827918 May 1989 Olerud
4841959 June 1989 Ransford
4998936 March 1991 Mehdian
5011484 April 1991 Breard
5030220 July 1991 Howland
5047055 September 1991 Bao et al.
5092866 March 1992 Breard et al.
5180393 January 1993 Commarmond
5201734 April 1993 Cozad et al.
5306275 April 1994 Bryan
5360430 November 1994 Lin
5366455 November 1994 Dove
5415661 May 1995 Holmes
5437672 August 1995 Alleyne
5454812 October 1995 Lin
5496318 March 1996 Howland et al.
5575819 November 1996 Amis
5609634 March 1997 Voydeville
5628756 May 1997 Barker, Jr. et al.
5645599 July 1997 Samani
5674295 October 1997 Ray et al.
5676702 October 1997 Ratron
5690649 November 1997 Li
5702452 December 1997 Argenson et al.
5725582 March 1998 Bevan et al.
5810815 September 1998 Morales
5836948 November 1998 Zucherman et al.
5860977 January 1999 Zucherman et al.
5976186 November 1999 Bao et al.
6022376 February 2000 Assell et al.
6048342 April 2000 Zucherman et al.
6068630 May 2000 Zucherman et al.
6090043 July 2000 Austin et al.
6132464 October 2000 Martin
6293949 September 2001 Justis et al.
6312431 November 2001 Asfora
6352537 March 2002 Strnad
6364883 April 2002 Santilli
6402750 June 2002 Atkinson et al.
6440169 August 2002 Elberg et al.
6451019 September 2002 Zucherman et al.
6582433 June 2003 Yun
6626944 September 2003 Taylor
6645207 November 2003 Dixon et al.
6695842 February 2004 Zucherman et al.
6709435 March 2004 Lin
6723126 April 2004 Berry
6733534 May 2004 Sherman
6761720 July 2004 Senegas
6835205 December 2004 Atkinson et al.
6946000 September 2005 Senegas et al.
7041136 May 2006 Goble et al.
7048736 May 2006 Robinson et al.
7087083 August 2006 Pasquet et al.
7101375 September 2006 Zucherman et al.
7163558 January 2007 Senegas et al.
7201751 April 2007 Zucherman et al.
7238204 July 2007 Le Couedic et al.
7306628 December 2007 Zucherman et al.
7377942 May 2008 Berry
7442208 October 2008 Mathieu et al.
7445637 November 2008 Taylor
7458981 December 2008 Fielding et al.
7524324 April 2009 Winslow et al.
2002/0143331 October 2002 Zucherman et al.
2003/0153915 August 2003 Nekozuka et al.
2004/0097931 May 2004 Mitchell
2005/0010293 January 2005 Zucherman et al.
2005/0049708 March 2005 Atkinson et al.
2005/0165398 July 2005 Reiley
2005/0203512 September 2005 Hawkins et al.
2005/0203624 September 2005 Serhan et al.
2005/0209603 September 2005 Zucherman et al.
2005/0228391 October 2005 Levy et al.
2005/0261768 November 2005 Trieu
2005/0288672 December 2005 Ferree
2006/0004447 January 2006 Mastrorio et al.
2006/0015181 January 2006 Elberg
2006/0064165 March 2006 Zucherman et al.
2006/0084983 April 2006 Kim
2006/0084985 April 2006 Kim
2006/0084987 April 2006 Kim
2006/0084988 April 2006 Kim
2006/0085069 April 2006 Kim
2006/0085070 April 2006 Kim
2006/0085074 April 2006 Raiszadeh
2006/0089654 April 2006 Lins et al.
2006/0089719 April 2006 Trieu
2006/0106381 May 2006 Ferree et al.
2006/0106397 May 2006 Lins
2006/0111728 May 2006 Abdou
2006/0122620 June 2006 Kim
2006/0136060 June 2006 Taylor
2006/0149278 July 2006 Abdou
2006/0184247 August 2006 Edidin et al.
2006/0184248 August 2006 Edidin et al.
2006/0195102 August 2006 Malandain
2006/0217726 September 2006 Maxy et al.
2006/0235386 October 2006 Anderson
2006/0235387 October 2006 Peterman
2006/0235532 October 2006 Meunier et al.
2006/0241601 October 2006 Trautwein et al.
2006/0241610 October 2006 Lim et al.
2006/0241613 October 2006 Bruneau et al.
2006/0241614 October 2006 Bruneau et al.
2006/0247623 November 2006 Anderson et al.
2006/0247640 November 2006 Blackwell et al.
2006/0264938 November 2006 Zucherman et al.
2006/0271044 November 2006 Petrini et al.
2006/0271049 November 2006 Zucherman et al.
2006/0293662 December 2006 Boyer, II et al.
2006/0293663 December 2006 Walkenhorst et al.
2007/0043362 February 2007 Malandain et al.
2007/0162000 July 2007 Perkins
2007/0191838 August 2007 Bruneau et al.
2007/0198091 August 2007 Boyer et al.
2007/0233068 October 2007 Bruneau et al.
2007/0233081 October 2007 Pasquet et al.
2007/0233089 October 2007 DiPoto et al.
2007/0270834 November 2007 Bruneau et al.
2007/0276369 November 2007 Allard et al.
2008/0009866 January 2008 Alamin et al.
2008/0161818 July 2008 Kloss et al.
2009/0270918 October 2009 Attia et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2821678 Nov., 1979 DE
0322334 Feb., 1992 EP
1138268 Oct., 2001 EP
1330987 Jul., 2003 EP
2623085 May., 1989 FR
2625097 Jun., 1989 FR
2681525 Mar., 1993 FR
2700941 Aug., 1994 FR
2703239 Oct., 1994 FR
2707864 Jan., 1995 FR
2717675 Sep., 1995 FR
2722087 Jan., 1996 FR
2722088 Jan., 1996 FR
2724554 Mar., 1996 FR
2725892 Apr., 1996 FR
2730156 Aug., 1996 FR
2775183 Aug., 1999 FR
2799948 Apr., 2001 FR
2816197 May., 2002 FR
02-224660 Sep., 1990 JP
09-075381 Mar., 1997 JP
988281 Jan., 1983 SU
1484348 Jun., 1989 SU
WO 94/26192 Nov., 1994 WO
WO 94/26195 Nov., 1994 WO
WO 98/20939 May., 1998 WO
WO 2004/047691 Jun., 2004 WO
WO 2005/009300 Feb., 2005 WO
WO 2005/044118 May., 2005 WO
WO 2005/110258 Nov., 2005 WO
WO 2006/064356 Jun., 2006 WO
WO 2007/034516 Mar., 2007 WO

Other References

"Dispositivo Intervertebrale Ammortizzante DIAM," date unknown, p. 1. cited by other .
"Tecnica Operatoria Per II Posizionamento Della Protesi DIAM," date unknown, pp. 1-3. cited by other .
"Wallis Operative Technique: Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of Lumbar Spine," date unknown, pp. 1-24, Spine Next, an Abbott Laboratories company, Bordeaux, France. cited by other .
Benzel et al., "Posterior Cervical Interspinous Compression Wiring and Fusion for Mid to Low Cervical Spinal Injuries," J. Neurosurg., Jun. 1989, ppp. 893-899, vol. 70. cited by other .
Caserta et al., "Elastic Stabilization Alone or Combined with Rigid Fusion in Spinal Surgery: a Biomechanical Study and Clinical Experience Based on 82 Cases," Eur. Spine J., Oct. 2002, pp. S192-S197, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. cited by other .
Christie et al., "Dynamic Interspinous Process Technology," Spine, 2005, pp. S73-S78, vol. 30, No. 16S. cited by other .
Cousin Biotech, "Analysis of Clinical Experience with a Posterior Shock-Absorbing Implant," date unknown, pp. 2-9. cited by other .
Cousin Biotech, Dispositif Intervertebral Amortissant, Jun. 1998, pp. 1-4. cited by other .
Cousin Biotech, Technique Operatoire de la Prothese DIAM, date unknown, Annexe 1, pp. 1-8. cited by other .
Dickman et al., "The Interspinous Method of Posterior Atlantoaxial Arthrodesis," J. Neurosurg., Feb. 1991, pp. 190-198, vol. 74. cited by other .
Dubois et al., "Dynamic Neutralization: A New Concept for Restabilization of the Spine," Lumbar Segmental Insability, Szpalski et al., eds., 1999, pp. 233-240, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. cited by other .
Ebara et al., "Inoperative Measurement of Lumbar Spinal Instability," Spine, 1992, pp. S44-S50, vol. 17, No. 3S. cited by other .
Fassio et al., "Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Instability L4-L5 by Interspinous Ligamentoplasty," Rachis, Dec. 1991, pp. 465-474, vol. 3, No. 6. cited by other .
Fassio, "Mise au Point Sur la Ligamentoplastie Inter-Epineuse Lombaire Dans les Instabilites," Ma trise Orthopedique, Jul. 1993, pp. 18, No. 25. cited by other .
Garner et al., "Development and Preclinical Testing of a New Tension-Band Device for the Spine: the Loop System," Eur. Spine J., Aug. 7, 2002, pp. S186-S191, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. cited by other .
Guang et al., "Interspinous Process Segmental Instrumentation with Bone-Button-Wire for Correction of Scoliosis," Chinese Medical J., 1990, pp. 721-725, vol. 103. cited by other .
Guizzardi et al., "The Use of DIAM (Interspinous Stress-Breaker Device) in the Prevention of Chronic Low Back Pain in Young Patients Operated on for Large Dimension Lumbar Disc Herniation," 12th Eur. Cong. Neurosurg., Sep. 7-12, 2003, pp. 835-839, Port. cited by other .
Hambly et al., "Tension Band Wiring-Bone Grafting for Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis," SPINE, 1989, pp. 455-460, vol. 14, No. 4. cited by other .
Kiwerski, "Rehabilitation of Patients with Thoracic Spine Injury Treated by Spring Alloplasty," Int. J. Rehab. Research, 1983, pp. 469-474, vol. 6, No. 4. cited by other .
Kramer et al., "Intervetertebral Disk Diseases: Causes, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prophylaxis," pp. 244-249, Medical, 1990. cited by other .
Laudet et al., "Comportement Bio-Mecanique D'Un Ressort Inter-Apophysaire Vertebral Posterieur Analyse Experimentale Due Comportement Discal En Compression Et En Flexion/Extension," Rachis, 1993, vol. 5, No. 2. cited by other .
Mah et al., "Threaded K-Wire Spinous Process Fixation of the Axis for Modified Gallie Fusion in Children and Adolescents," J. Pediatric Othopaedics, 1989, pp. 675-679, vol. 9. cited by other .
Mariottini et al., "Preliminary Results of a Soft Novel Lumbar Intervertebral Prothesis (DIAM) in the Degenerative Spinal Pathology," Acta Neurochir., Adv. Peripheral Nerve Surg. and Minimal Invas. Spinal Surg., 2005, pp. 129-131, vol. 92, Suppl. cited by other .
McDonnell et al., "Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion: Indications and Techniques," Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 92-106, Ch. 9, Thieme, New York. cited by other .
Minns et al., "Preliminary Design and Experimental Studies of a Novel Soft Implant for Correcting Sagittal Plane Instability in the Lumbar Spine," Spine, 1997, pp. 1819-1825, vol. 22, No. 16. cited by other .
Muller, "Restauration Dynamique de la Stabilite Rachidienne," Tire de la Sulzer Technical Review, Jan. 1999, Sulzer Management Ltd, Winterthur, Switzerland. cited by other .
Pennal et al., "Stenosis of the Lumbar Spinal Canal," Clinical Neurosurgery: Proceedings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, 1970, Tindall et al., eds., 1971, Ch. 6, pp. 86-105, vol. 18. cited by other .
Petrini et al., "Analisi Di Un'Esperienza Clinica Con Un Impianto Posteriore Ammortizzante," S.O.T.I.M.I. Societa di Ortopedia e Traumatologia dell'Italia Meridionale e Insulare 90.degree. Congresso, Jun. 21-23, 2001, Paestum. cited by other .
Petrini et al., "Stabilizzazione Elastica," Patologia Degenerativa del Rachide Lombare, Oct. 5-6, 2001, Rimini. cited by other .
Porter, "Spinal Stenosis and Neurogenic Claudication," Spine, Sep. 1, 1996, pp. 2046-2052, vol. 21, No. 17. cited by other .
Pupin et al., "Clinical Experience with a Posterior Shock-Absorbing Implant in Lumbar Spine," World Spine 1: First Interdisciplinary World Congress on Spinal Surgery and Related Disciplines, Aug. 27-Sep. 1, 2000, Berlin, Germany. cited by other .
Rengachary et al., "Cervical Spine Stabilization with Flexible, Multistrand Cable System," Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 79-81, Ch. 7, Thieme, New York. cited by other .
Richards et al., "The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication," Spine, 2005, pp. 744-749, vol. 30, No. 7. cited by other .
Scarf , "Instability/Stenosis: Holistic Approach for Less Invasive Surgery," date unknown, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. cited by other .
Schiavone et al., "The Use of Disc Assistance Prosthesis (DIAM) in Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: Indications, Technique, Results," Italian J. Spinal Disorders, 2003, pp. 213-220, vol. 3, No. 2. cited by other .
Schlegel et al., "The Role of Distraction in Improving the Space Available in the Lumbar Stenotic Canal and Foramen," Spine, 1994, pp. 2041-2047, vol. 19, No. 18. cited by other .
Senegas et al., "Le Recalibrage du Canal Lombaire, Alternative a la Laminectomie dans le Traitement des Stenoses du Canal Lombaire," Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique, 1988, pp. 15-22. cited by other .
Senegas et al., "Stabilisation Lombaire Souple," Instabilite Vertebrales Lombaires, Gastambide, ed., 1995, pp. 122-132, Expansion Scientifique Francaise, Paris, France. cited by other .
Senegas, "La Ligamentoplastie Inter Vertebrale Lombaire, Alternative a L'Arthrodese," La Revue de Medecine Orthopedique, Jun. 1990, pp. 33-35, No. 20. cited by other .
Senegas, "La Ligamentoplastie Intervertebrale, Alternative a L'arthrodese dans le Traitement des Instabilites Degeneratives," Acta Othopaedica Belgica, 1991, pp. 221-226, vol. 57, Suppl. I. cited by other .
Senegas, "Mechanical Supplementation by Non-Rigid Fixation in Degenerative Intervertebral Lumbar Segments: the Wallis System," Eur. Spine J., 2002, p. S164-S169, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. cited by other .
Senegas, "Rencontre," Ma trise Orthopedique, May 1995, pp. 1-3, No. 44. cited by other .
Serhan, "Spinal Implants: Past, Present, and Future," 19th International IEEE/EMBS Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 1997, pp. 2636-2639, Chicago, Illinois. cited by other .
Spadea et al., "Interspinous Fusion for the Treatment of Herniated Intervertebral Discs: Utilizing a Lumbar Spinous Process as a Bone Graft," Annals of Surgery, 1952, pp. 982-986, vol. 136, No. 6. cited by other .
Sulzer Innotec, "DIAM--Modified CAD Geometry and Meshing," date unknown. cited by other .
Taylor et al., "Analyse d'une experience clinique d'un implant posterieur amortissant," Rachis Revue de Pathologie Vertebrale, Oct./Nov. 1999, vol. 11, No. 4-5, Gieda Inter Rachis. cited by other .
Taylor et al., "Surgical Requirement for the Posterior Control of the Rotational Centers," date unknown. cited by other .
Taylor et al., "Technical and Anatomical Considerations for the Placement of a Posterior Interspinous Stabilizer," 2004, pp. 1-10, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee. cited by other .
Taylor, "Biomechanical Requirements for the Posterior Control of the Centers of Rotation," Swiss Spine Institute International Symposium: Progress in Spinal Fixation, Jun. 21-22, 2002, pp. 1-2, Swiss Spine Institute, Bern, Switzerland. cited by other .
Taylor, "Non-Fusion Technologies of the Posterior Column: A New Posterior Shock Absorber," International Symposium on Intervertebral Disc Replacement and Non-Fusion-Technology, May 3-5, 2001, Spine Arthroplasty. cited by other .
Taylor, "Posterior Dynamic Stabilization using the DIAM (Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion)," date unknown, pp. 1-5. cited by other .
Taylor, "Presentation a un an d'un dispositif amortissant d'assistance discale," 5emes journees Avances & Controverses en pathologie rachidienne, Oct. 1-2, 1998, Faculte Libre de Medecine de Lille. cited by other .
Tsuji et al., "Ceramic Interspinous Block (CISB) Assisted Anterior Interbody Fusion," J. Spinal Disorders, 1990, pp. 77-86, vol. 3, No. 1. cited by other .
Vangilder, "Interspinous, Laminar, and Facet Posterior Cervical Bone Fusions," Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 135-146, Ch. 13, Thieme, New York. cited by other .
Voydeville et al., "Experimental Lumbar Instability and Artificial Ligament," Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol., Jul. 15, 2000, pp. 167-176, vol. 10. cited by other .
Voydeville et al., "Lumbar Instability Treated by Intervertebral Ligamentoplasty with Smooth Wedges," Orthopedie Traumatologie, 1992, pp. 259-264, vol. 2, No. 4. cited by other .
Waldemar Link, "Spinal Surgery: Instrumentation and Implants for Spinal Surgery," 1981, Link America Inc., New Jersey. cited by other .
Wiltse et al., "The Treatment of Spinal Stenosis," Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Urist, ed., Mar.-Apr. 1976, pp. 83-91, No. 115. cited by other .
Wisneski et al., "Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis," Seminars in Spine Surgery, Wiesel, ed., Jun. 1994, pp. 116-123, vol. 6, No. 2. cited by other .
Zdeblick et al., "Two-Point Fixation of the Lumbar Spine Differential Stability in Rotation," Spine, 1991, pp. S298-S301, vol. 16, No. 6, Supplement. cited by other .
Zucherman et al., "Clinical Efficacy of Spinal Instrumentation in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease," Spine, Jul. 1992, pp. 834-837, vol. 17, No. 7. cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Woodall; Nicholas

Parent Case Text



This application is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/527,251, filed Mar. 9, 2005 which is a national phase filing of international application no. PCT/FR2003/002635, filed Sep. 3, 2003, which claims priority to French patent application no. 02 11189, filed Sep. 10, 2002, now issued, the contents of each of the foregoing is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Claims



The invention claimed is:

1. A posterior vertebral support assembly, comprising: an interspinous wedge configured to be inserted between the spinous processes of two vertebrae, wherein the wedge includes: first and second opposing ends, each shaped to receive the respective spinous processes, first and second lateral sides extending from the first end to the second end, and at least one elastically deformable zone; an elastic, stretchable strap engageable around at least two spinous processes and the wedge while the wedge ends receive the spinous processes; the strap forming a first and a second compressive lateral element disposed on opposing lateral sides of the wedge; the first and second compressive lateral elements being configured to be disposed at a first distance apart when the vertebrae are in extension and at a second distance, less than the first distance, when the vertebrae are in flexion; and first and second lateral transmission elements disposed respectively between the first compressive lateral element and the wedge and the second compressive lateral element and the wedge, the first and second lateral transmission elements being adapted to press against the lateral sides of the wedge substantially midway between the first and second ends in a transverse direction in response to forces applied by the first and second compressive lateral elements when the first and second compressive lateral elements are moved from the first distance apart to the second distance apart; the lateral transmission elements, while the wedge ends receive the spinous processes, not extending through a sagittal plane defined by the spinous processes in the space between the spinous processes.

2. The support assembly of claim 1 wherein the wedge comprises two recesses with each recess bounded by two lugs, the lugs and recesses adapted to cradle their respective spinous processes.

3. A posterior vertebral support assembly, comprising: an interspinous wedge configured to be inserted between the spinous processes of two vertebrae, wherein the wedge includes: first and second opposing ends, each shaped to engage with and to receive the respective spinous processes; first and second lateral sides extending from the first end to the second end; at least one elastically deformable zone; a strap engageable around at least two spinous processes and the wedge, the strap forming a first and a second compressive lateral element disposed on opposing lateral sides of the wedge, the first and second compressive lateral elements being configured to maintain the position of the wedge; first and second lateral transmission elements disposed respectively between the first compressive lateral element and the wedge and the second compressive lateral element and the wedge, the first and second lateral transmission elements being adapted to press against the lateral sides of the wedge substantially midway between the first and second ends in a transverse direction in response to forces applied by the first and second compressive lateral elements; wherein the first and second lateral transmission elements are each a small bar disposed between the compressive lateral elements and the wedge; and wherein each small bar is connected to a support plate configured to transfer force from the lateral transmission elements to the elastically deformable zone, a first end with a saddle-shaped receiver sized to receive and engage a spinous process of a first vertebra; a second end longitudinally opposite the first end with a saddle-shaped receiver sized to receive and engage a spinous process of a second vertebra; a longitudinal axis extending through said saddle-shaped receivers of said first and second ends; an elastically deformable zone between the saddle-shaped receivers; a first lateral side adjacent the deformable zone; a second lateral side adjacent the deformable zone and opposite the first lateral side; the distance between the first and second ends being greater than the distance between the first and second lateral sides; first and second longitudinally extending compressive lateral elements disposed adjacent to the lateral sides of the interspinous wedge, but entirely spaced away therefrom; the compressive lateral elements being deformable between releasing positions and compressive positions and each being sized to extend from the first vertebra to the second vertebra and being shaped to connect to both the first vertebra and the second vertebra.

4. The posterior vertebral support assembly of claim 1 where the wedge further comprises first and second saddle recesses formed on the first and second ends respectively; the wedge further comprising a longitudinal axis extending through the first and second saddle recesses; the lateral transmission elements not extending through the longitudinal axis.

5. The posterior vertebral support assembly of claim 1 wherein the first and second lateral transmission elements are each a small bar disposed between the compressive lateral elements and the wedge.
Description



The present invention concerns a posterior vertebral support assembly.

In the case of degeneration of the intervertebral disc of two vertebrae and/or of ligament distension, it is known to place a wedge between the spinous processes of the two vertebrae concerned, making it possible to support the vertebrae. In this regard, reference may be made to French Patent Applications Nos. FR 94 03716 and FR 98 02300 tiled in the name of the proprietor of the present application.

The wedges according to these earlier patent applications are connected to the spinous processes of the two treated vertebrae by two independent ligaments, each of the ligaments passing through the wedge and tightly surrounding the corresponding spinous process. In the case of flexion of the spinal column in a forward direction, the spinous processes move away from one another, thereby causing longitudinal stretching of the wedge.

A drawback of this longitudinal stretching is that of stressing the wedge in longitudinal traction. The conditions of exertion of this traction can however be perfected, in particular in order to obtain assisted and contained control of the movement of the vertebrae, inasmuch as the repetition of this traction threatens to affect the durability of the wedge.

The present invention aims to remedy this drawback.

The assembly which it concerns comprises, in a manner known per se, an interspinous wedge configured to be inserted between the spinous processes of two vertebrae to be treated, whereof at least the zone designed to be placed between the spinous processes of the vertebrae is made of an elastically deformable material.

According to the invention, the assembly further comprises:

two compressive lateral elements, designed to be placed on either side of the wedge in the longitudinal direction, the compressive lateral elements being deformable between releasing positions, which they occupy when the vertebrae are in lordosis or when the spinal column is extended, and wherein they are relatively spaced apart from the wedge in the transverse direction, and compressive positions, which they occupy when the spinal column is in flexion, and wherein they are relatively close to the wedge in the transverse direction; and

two lateral transmission elements, placed between the compressive lateral elements and the wedge, configured in order, when the compressive lateral elements are displaced in said compressive position, to press against the wedge in the transverse direction thereof, at the zone of the wedge designed to be placed between the spinous processes of the vertebrae.

The assembly according to the invention thus makes it possible to exert a progressive transverse compression on the wedge during the movement of flexion of the spinal column. This compression will reduce the shear stresses which are exerted on the wedge during intervertebral distancing combining tilting and forward sliding movements, owing to the containment of the displacements effected by the wedge.

The transverse compression of the wedge is preferable to pure longitudinal traction from the point of view of durability of the wedge, since it compensates the stressing of the wedge in the longitudinal direction.

The zone of the wedge designed to be placed between the spinous processes may be made of a material having limit of compressibility in the transverse direction of the wedge, and the assembly may then be configured such that this limit is reached when the treated vertebrae attain a predetermined tilted position.

It is also possible to configure the compressive lateral elements so that the elements have a limit of deformation in the transverse direction, this limit of deformation being reached when the treated vertebrae attain a predetermined tilted position.

The compressive lateral elements may be deformed nonelastically or elastically between said releasing and compressive positions. In the latter case, the return force of the elements to their neutral form contributes to the damping of the tilting movement of the treated vertebrae.

The compressive lateral elements may likewise be elastically deformable in the longitudinal direction of the compressive lateral elements, to the same end.

According to one embodiment of the invention, the compressive lateral elements are independent of one another, and each is connected to one of the treated vertebrae by one end and to the other treated vertebra by its other end. The connection of the ends of the compressive lateral elements to the vertebrae may in particular be effected at the pedicles of the vertebrae, by means of pedicular screws engaged in eyelets or anchorage pieces included in the compressive lateral elements.

The connection of the compressive lateral elements to the vertebrae may also be effected, in the case of the overlying vertebra, by means of the passage of the elements beneath the laminae of that vertebra. This sub-laminal passage makes it possible to preserve the pedicles and to be as central as possible in order, during the longitudinal elongation, to optimize the transverse thrust exerted on the wedge. In the case of the underlying vertebra, these same compressive lateral elements may also be connected to an interpedicular transverse connecting bar, placed in position especially in the case of laminectomy on this vertebra, thus making it possible to reduce the concentration of strains. Similarly, the compressive lateral elements may be connected to a connecting bar joined to a system of arthrodesis of the two underlying vertebrae.

According to another embodiment of the invention, the compressive lateral elements are formed by the two lateral portions of a circular strap engaged round the spinous processes of the two treated vertebrae.

The lateral transmission elements themselves may be constituted by small bars bearing on the one hand against the compressive lateral elements and on the other hand against the wedge, especially via small support plates.

These same lateral transmission elements may likewise be constituted by bosses connected either to the compressive lateral elements or to the wedge. In the latter case, the bosses may be integral with the wedge.

The wedge may be made entirely of an elastically deformable material such as a silicone; it may in particular comprise a core made of such a material and a textile envelope containing the core.

The wedge may also be formed by a band of resilient material, suitably curved.

The wedge may comprise a spring placed transversely at its zone designed to be placed between the spinous processes.

For greater understanding thereof, the invention is described again hereinafter with reference to the appended diagrammatic drawing representing, by way of non-limiting example, several possible embodiments of the assembly concerned.

FIG. 1 is a rear view, very simplified, after the positioning on two vertebrae;

FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1, according to the second embodiment;

FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 1, according to the third embodiment, only the spinous processes of the vertebrae being shown, and

FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIG. 3, according to a variant.

FIG. 1 represents a posterior vertebral support assembly 1 placed in position on two vertebrae 2 affected by degeneration of the disc 3 and/or ligament distension.

The assembly 1 comprises an interspinous wedge 5, two compressive lateral elements 6 and two lateral transmission elements 7.

The wedge 5 is made of an elastically flexible material and comprises two curved recesses 8 allowing it to be inserted between the spinous processes 9 of the two vertebrae 2. It may in particular conform to the wedge according to French Patent Application No. FR 98 02300, that is to say:

comprising a core made of silicone and an envelope made of polyester fabric,

having an interspinous portion 10 having a height greater than the distance separating the spinous processes 9 when the vertebrae 2 are in lordosis in order to be compressed when the wedge 5 is inserted between the processes 9 and to permit relief of the disc 3 and also restoration of the ligaments to functional tension, and

having lugs 11 which bound the curved recesses 8, the lugs 11 broadly enveloping the processes 9 and being self-tightened round the processes 9 when said interspinous portion 10 is compressed.

The wedge 5 shown in FIG. 1 differs, however, from the wedge according to the aforesaid French Patent Application No. FR 98 02300 in that it has domed lateral walls, imparting to it a relatively large width at said interspinous portion 10.

Each element 6 is formed by a lamina 15 made of elastically deformable synthetic material and by two eyelets 16 connected to the ends of the lamina 15. The latter is curved and comprises the element 7 at the median portion of its concave face, the concave face being designed to be turned towards the wedge 5.

The eyelets 16 are designed to receive pedicular screws permitting the anchorage of the elements 6 to the vertebrae 2.

Each element 7 is formed by a small rigid bar 20 fixed to an element 6, and is oriented substantially perpendicularly to the zone of the element 6 to which it is connected. The bar 20 is placed, after implantation, at the interspinous portion 10 of the wedge 5.

Each bar 20 is rigidly connected with a small plate 21 for bearing against the portion 10.

The assembly 1 according to the invention is in the position shown in

FIG. 1 when the vertebrae 2 are in lordosis.

In the case of extension of the spinal column, the vertebrae 2 pivot in a direction in which the processes 9 are brought closer to one another, thereby leading to compression of the wedge 5 up to the limit of elasticity of the material constituting the core of the wedge. A damping of the pivoting movement of the vertebrae 2 is thus obtained as long as said limit of elasticity is not reached, then the arresting of that same movement is obtained when the limit of elasticity is reached. During this compression of the wedge 5, the elements 6 are deformed in the direction in which their curvature is increased, contributing to the damping of the movement of the vertebrae 2. The elements 6 likewise provide a perfect guarantee of maintenance of the position of the wedge 5 between the processes 9.

In the case of flexure of the spinal column, the vertebrae 2 pivot in a direction in which the processes 9 are spaced from each other, thereby leading to a reduction in the curvature of the elements 6. The elements 7 then press against the wedge 5 transversely, thereby also making it possible to dampen the movement of the vertebrae 2 then to arrest that movement when the limit of elasticity of the material forming the core of the wedge 5 is reached and/or when the elements come close to a substantially rectilinear form.

FIG. 2 shows an assembly 1 similar to that just described, except that the elements 6 are formed by the two lateral portions of a circular strap 25 engaged round the processes 9 of the vertebrae 2. The other portions or elements already described, which are to be found again in this second embodiment, are not described again and are designated by the same numerical references as before.

The strap 25 may be made of a slightly elastically stretchable material, and thus also contributes to the damping and then blocking of the pivoting movement of the vertebrae 2 in the case of flexion of the spinal column.

FIGS. 3 and 4 show a third embodiment of the assembly 1, in which the latter is similar to that shown in FIG. 2, except that the small bars 20 and plates 21 are replaced by bosses 30 along which pass the lateral portions of the strap 25. The bosses 30 may be fixed to the wedge 5 or be integral therewith, as shown in FIG. 3, or may be rigidly connected with the strap 25 and bear against the wedge 5, optionally at lateral recesses which the wedge includes to receive them, as shown in FIG. 4.

As it appears from the foregoing, the invention provides a decisive improvement on the prior art, by providing a posterior vertebral support assembly which does not stress the wedge in the longitudinal direction during the movement of flexion of the spinal column. Perfect control of the movement of the vertebrae is obtained by means of this assembly, and the durability of the wedge is not affected by the repeated movements of the vertebrae.

It is self-evident that the invention is not limited to the embodiment described above by way of example, but that on the contrary it encompasses all the variants of embodiment coming within the scope of protection defined by the appended claims.

* * * * *

File A Patent Application

  • Protect your idea -- Don't let someone else file first. Learn more.

  • 3 Easy Steps -- Complete Form, application Review, and File. See our process.

  • Attorney Review -- Have your application reviewed by a Patent Attorney. See what's included.