Search All Patents:

---

Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF

---

United States Patent	8,043,336
Taylor	October 25, 2011

---

---

---

Related U.S. Patent Documents

---

	Application Number	Filing Date	Patent Number	Issue Date
	10527251		7776069
	PCT/FR03/02635	Sep., 2003

---

Foreign Application Priority Data

---

Sep 10, 2002 [FR]			02 11189

Current U.S. Class:	606/249
Current International Class:	A61B 17/70 (20060101)
Field of Search:	606/248,249

---

References Cited

---

U.S. Patent Documents

2677369	May 1954	Knowles
3648691	March 1972	Lumb et al.
4003376	January 1977	McKay et al.
4011602	March 1977	Rybicki et al.
4257409	March 1981	Bacal et al.
4448191	May 1984	Rodnyansky et al.
4554914	November 1985	Kapp et al.
4570618	February 1986	Wu
4573454	March 1986	Hoffman
4604995	August 1986	Stephens et al.
4643174	February 1987	Horiuchi
4643178	February 1987	Nasatari et al.
4686970	August 1987	Dove et al.
4776851	October 1988	Bruchman et al.
4827918	May 1989	Olerud
4841959	June 1989	Ransford
4998936	March 1991	Mehdian
5011484	April 1991	Breard
5030220	July 1991	Howland
5047055	September 1991	Bao et al.
5092866	March 1992	Breard et al.
5180393	January 1993	Commarmond
5201734	April 1993	Cozad et al.
5306275	April 1994	Bryan
5360430	November 1994	Lin
5366455	November 1994	Dove
5415661	May 1995	Holmes
5437672	August 1995	Alleyne
5454812	October 1995	Lin
5496318	March 1996	Howland et al.
5575819	November 1996	Amis
5609634	March 1997	Voydeville
5628756	May 1997	Barker, Jr. et al.
5645599	July 1997	Samani
5674295	October 1997	Ray et al.
5676702	October 1997	Ratron
5690649	November 1997	Li
5702452	December 1997	Argenson et al.
5725582	March 1998	Bevan et al.
5810815	September 1998	Morales
5836948	November 1998	Zucherman et al.
5860977	January 1999	Zucherman et al.
5976186	November 1999	Bao et al.
6022376	February 2000	Assell et al.
6048342	April 2000	Zucherman et al.
6068630	May 2000	Zucherman et al.
6090043	July 2000	Austin et al.
6132464	October 2000	Martin
6293949	September 2001	Justis et al.
6312431	November 2001	Asfora
6352537	March 2002	Strnad
6364883	April 2002	Santilli
6402750	June 2002	Atkinson et al.
6440169	August 2002	Elberg et al.
6451019	September 2002	Zucherman et al.
6582433	June 2003	Yun
6626944	September 2003	Taylor
6645207	November 2003	Dixon et al.
6695842	February 2004	Zucherman et al.
6709435	March 2004	Lin
6723126	April 2004	Berry
6733534	May 2004	Sherman
6761720	July 2004	Senegas
6835205	December 2004	Atkinson et al.
6946000	September 2005	Senegas et al.
7041136	May 2006	Goble et al.
7048736	May 2006	Robinson et al.
7087083	August 2006	Pasquet et al.
7101375	September 2006	Zucherman et al.
7163558	January 2007	Senegas et al.
7201751	April 2007	Zucherman et al.
7238204	July 2007	Le Couedic et al.
7306628	December 2007	Zucherman et al.
7377942	May 2008	Berry
7442208	October 2008	Mathieu et al.
7445637	November 2008	Taylor
7458981	December 2008	Fielding et al.
7524324	April 2009	Winslow et al.
2002/0143331	October 2002	Zucherman et al.
2003/0153915	August 2003	Nekozuka et al.
2004/0097931	May 2004	Mitchell
2005/0010293	January 2005	Zucherman et al.
2005/0049708	March 2005	Atkinson et al.
2005/0165398	July 2005	Reiley
2005/0203512	September 2005	Hawkins et al.
2005/0203624	September 2005	Serhan et al.
2005/0209603	September 2005	Zucherman et al.
2005/0228391	October 2005	Levy et al.
2005/0261768	November 2005	Trieu
2005/0288672	December 2005	Ferree
2006/0004447	January 2006	Mastrorio et al.
2006/0015181	January 2006	Elberg
2006/0064165	March 2006	Zucherman et al.
2006/0084983	April 2006	Kim
2006/0084985	April 2006	Kim
2006/0084987	April 2006	Kim
2006/0084988	April 2006	Kim
2006/0085069	April 2006	Kim
2006/0085070	April 2006	Kim
2006/0085074	April 2006	Raiszadeh
2006/0089654	April 2006	Lins et al.
2006/0089719	April 2006	Trieu
2006/0106381	May 2006	Ferree et al.
2006/0106397	May 2006	Lins
2006/0111728	May 2006	Abdou
2006/0122620	June 2006	Kim
2006/0136060	June 2006	Taylor
2006/0149278	July 2006	Abdou
2006/0184247	August 2006	Edidin et al.
2006/0184248	August 2006	Edidin et al.
2006/0195102	August 2006	Malandain
2006/0217726	September 2006	Maxy et al.
2006/0235386	October 2006	Anderson
2006/0235387	October 2006	Peterman
2006/0235532	October 2006	Meunier et al.
2006/0241601	October 2006	Trautwein et al.
2006/0241610	October 2006	Lim et al.
2006/0241613	October 2006	Bruneau et al.
2006/0241614	October 2006	Bruneau et al.
2006/0247623	November 2006	Anderson et al.
2006/0247640	November 2006	Blackwell et al.
2006/0264938	November 2006	Zucherman et al.
2006/0271044	November 2006	Petrini et al.
2006/0271049	November 2006	Zucherman et al.
2006/0293662	December 2006	Boyer, II et al.
2006/0293663	December 2006	Walkenhorst et al.
2007/0043362	February 2007	Malandain et al.
2007/0162000	July 2007	Perkins
2007/0191838	August 2007	Bruneau et al.
2007/0198091	August 2007	Boyer et al.
2007/0233068	October 2007	Bruneau et al.
2007/0233081	October 2007	Pasquet et al.
2007/0233089	October 2007	DiPoto et al.
2007/0270834	November 2007	Bruneau et al.
2007/0276369	November 2007	Allard et al.
2008/0009866	January 2008	Alamin et al.
2008/0161818	July 2008	Kloss et al.
2009/0270918	October 2009	Attia et al.

Foreign Patent Documents

	2821678		Nov., 1979		DE
	0322334		Feb., 1992		EP
	1138268		Oct., 2001		EP
	1330987		Jul., 2003		EP
	2623085		May., 1989		FR
	2625097		Jun., 1989		FR
	2681525		Mar., 1993		FR
	2700941		Aug., 1994		FR
	2703239		Oct., 1994		FR
	2707864		Jan., 1995		FR
	2717675		Sep., 1995		FR
	2722087		Jan., 1996		FR
	2722088		Jan., 1996		FR
	2724554		Mar., 1996		FR
	2725892		Apr., 1996		FR
	2730156		Aug., 1996		FR
	2775183		Aug., 1999		FR
	2799948		Apr., 2001		FR
	2816197		May., 2002		FR
	02-224660		Sep., 1990		JP
	09-075381		Mar., 1997		JP
	988281		Jan., 1983		SU
	1484348		Jun., 1989		SU
	WO 94/26192		Nov., 1994		WO
	WO 94/26195		Nov., 1994		WO
	WO 98/20939		May., 1998		WO
	WO 2004/047691		Jun., 2004		WO
	WO 2005/009300		Feb., 2005		WO
	WO 2005/044118		May., 2005		WO
	WO 2005/110258		Nov., 2005		WO
	WO 2006/064356		Jun., 2006		WO
	WO 2007/034516		Mar., 2007		WO

Other References

"Dispositivo Intervertebrale Ammortizzante DIAM," date unknown, p. 1. cited by other . "Tecnica Operatoria Per II Posizionamento Della Protesi DIAM," date unknown, pp. 1-3. cited by other . "Wallis Operative Technique: Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of Lumbar Spine," date unknown, pp. 1-24, Spine Next, an Abbott Laboratories company, Bordeaux, France. cited by other . Benzel et al., "Posterior Cervical Interspinous Compression Wiring and Fusion for Mid to Low Cervical Spinal Injuries," J. Neurosurg., Jun. 1989, ppp. 893-899, vol. 70. cited by other . Caserta et al., "Elastic Stabilization Alone or Combined with Rigid Fusion in Spinal Surgery: a Biomechanical Study and Clinical Experience Based on 82 Cases," Eur. Spine J., Oct. 2002, pp. S192-S197, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. cited by other . Christie et al., "Dynamic Interspinous Process Technology," Spine, 2005, pp. S73-S78, vol. 30, No. 16S. cited by other . Cousin Biotech, "Analysis of Clinical Experience with a Posterior Shock-Absorbing Implant," date unknown, pp. 2-9. cited by other . Cousin Biotech, Dispositif Intervertebral Amortissant, Jun. 1998, pp. 1-4. cited by other . Cousin Biotech, Technique Operatoire de la Prothese DIAM, date unknown, Annexe 1, pp. 1-8. cited by other . Dickman et al., "The Interspinous Method of Posterior Atlantoaxial Arthrodesis," J. Neurosurg., Feb. 1991, pp. 190-198, vol. 74. cited by other . Dubois et al., "Dynamic Neutralization: A New Concept for Restabilization of the Spine," Lumbar Segmental Insability, Szpalski et al., eds., 1999, pp. 233-240, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. cited by other . Ebara et al., "Inoperative Measurement of Lumbar Spinal Instability," Spine, 1992, pp. S44-S50, vol. 17, No. 3S. cited by other . Fassio et al., "Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Instability L4-L5 by Interspinous Ligamentoplasty," Rachis, Dec. 1991, pp. 465-474, vol. 3, No. 6. cited by other . Fassio, "Mise au Point Sur la Ligamentoplastie Inter-Epineuse Lombaire Dans les Instabilites," Ma trise Orthopedique, Jul. 1993, pp. 18, No. 25. cited by other . Garner et al., "Development and Preclinical Testing of a New Tension-Band Device for the Spine: the Loop System," Eur. Spine J., Aug. 7, 2002, pp. S186-S191, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. cited by other . Guang et al., "Interspinous Process Segmental Instrumentation with Bone-Button-Wire for Correction of Scoliosis," Chinese Medical J., 1990, pp. 721-725, vol. 103. cited by other . Guizzardi et al., "The Use of DIAM (Interspinous Stress-Breaker Device) in the Prevention of Chronic Low Back Pain in Young Patients Operated on for Large Dimension Lumbar Disc Herniation," 12th Eur. Cong. Neurosurg., Sep. 7-12, 2003, pp. 835-839, Port. cited by other . Hambly et al., "Tension Band Wiring-Bone Grafting for Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis," SPINE, 1989, pp. 455-460, vol. 14, No. 4. cited by other . Kiwerski, "Rehabilitation of Patients with Thoracic Spine Injury Treated by Spring Alloplasty," Int. J. Rehab. Research, 1983, pp. 469-474, vol. 6, No. 4. cited by other . Kramer et al., "Intervetertebral Disk Diseases: Causes, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prophylaxis," pp. 244-249, Medical, 1990. cited by other . Laudet et al., "Comportement Bio-Mecanique D'Un Ressort Inter-Apophysaire Vertebral Posterieur Analyse Experimentale Due Comportement Discal En Compression Et En Flexion/Extension," Rachis, 1993, vol. 5, No. 2. cited by other . Mah et al., "Threaded K-Wire Spinous Process Fixation of the Axis for Modified Gallie Fusion in Children and Adolescents," J. Pediatric Othopaedics, 1989, pp. 675-679, vol. 9. cited by other . Mariottini et al., "Preliminary Results of a Soft Novel Lumbar Intervertebral Prothesis (DIAM) in the Degenerative Spinal Pathology," Acta Neurochir., Adv. Peripheral Nerve Surg. and Minimal Invas. Spinal Surg., 2005, pp. 129-131, vol. 92, Suppl. cited by other . McDonnell et al., "Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion: Indications and Techniques," Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 92-106, Ch. 9, Thieme, New York. cited by other . Minns et al., "Preliminary Design and Experimental Studies of a Novel Soft Implant for Correcting Sagittal Plane Instability in the Lumbar Spine," Spine, 1997, pp. 1819-1825, vol. 22, No. 16. cited by other . Muller, "Restauration Dynamique de la Stabilite Rachidienne," Tire de la Sulzer Technical Review, Jan. 1999, Sulzer Management Ltd, Winterthur, Switzerland. cited by other . Pennal et al., "Stenosis of the Lumbar Spinal Canal," Clinical Neurosurgery: Proceedings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, 1970, Tindall et al., eds., 1971, Ch. 6, pp. 86-105, vol. 18. cited by other . Petrini et al., "Analisi Di Un'Esperienza Clinica Con Un Impianto Posteriore Ammortizzante," S.O.T.I.M.I. Societa di Ortopedia e Traumatologia dell'Italia Meridionale e Insulare 90.degree. Congresso, Jun. 21-23, 2001, Paestum. cited by other . Petrini et al., "Stabilizzazione Elastica," Patologia Degenerativa del Rachide Lombare, Oct. 5-6, 2001, Rimini. cited by other . Porter, "Spinal Stenosis and Neurogenic Claudication," Spine, Sep. 1, 1996, pp. 2046-2052, vol. 21, No. 17. cited by other . Pupin et al., "Clinical Experience with a Posterior Shock-Absorbing Implant in Lumbar Spine," World Spine 1: First Interdisciplinary World Congress on Spinal Surgery and Related Disciplines, Aug. 27-Sep. 1, 2000, Berlin, Germany. cited by other . Rengachary et al., "Cervical Spine Stabilization with Flexible, Multistrand Cable System," Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 79-81, Ch. 7, Thieme, New York. cited by other . Richards et al., "The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication," Spine, 2005, pp. 744-749, vol. 30, No. 7. cited by other . Scarf , "Instability/Stenosis: Holistic Approach for Less Invasive Surgery," date unknown, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. cited by other . Schiavone et al., "The Use of Disc Assistance Prosthesis (DIAM) in Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: Indications, Technique, Results," Italian J. Spinal Disorders, 2003, pp. 213-220, vol. 3, No. 2. cited by other . Schlegel et al., "The Role of Distraction in Improving the Space Available in the Lumbar Stenotic Canal and Foramen," Spine, 1994, pp. 2041-2047, vol. 19, No. 18. cited by other . Senegas et al., "Le Recalibrage du Canal Lombaire, Alternative a la Laminectomie dans le Traitement des Stenoses du Canal Lombaire," Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique, 1988, pp. 15-22. cited by other . Senegas et al., "Stabilisation Lombaire Souple," Instabilite Vertebrales Lombaires, Gastambide, ed., 1995, pp. 122-132, Expansion Scientifique Francaise, Paris, France. cited by other . Senegas, "La Ligamentoplastie Inter Vertebrale Lombaire, Alternative a L'Arthrodese," La Revue de Medecine Orthopedique, Jun. 1990, pp. 33-35, No. 20. cited by other . Senegas, "La Ligamentoplastie Intervertebrale, Alternative a L'arthrodese dans le Traitement des Instabilites Degeneratives," Acta Othopaedica Belgica, 1991, pp. 221-226, vol. 57, Suppl. I. cited by other . Senegas, "Mechanical Supplementation by Non-Rigid Fixation in Degenerative Intervertebral Lumbar Segments: the Wallis System," Eur. Spine J., 2002, p. S164-S169, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. cited by other . Senegas, "Rencontre," Ma trise Orthopedique, May 1995, pp. 1-3, No. 44. cited by other . Serhan, "Spinal Implants: Past, Present, and Future," 19th International IEEE/EMBS Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 1997, pp. 2636-2639, Chicago, Illinois. cited by other . Spadea et al., "Interspinous Fusion for the Treatment of Herniated Intervertebral Discs: Utilizing a Lumbar Spinous Process as a Bone Graft," Annals of Surgery, 1952, pp. 982-986, vol. 136, No. 6. cited by other . Sulzer Innotec, "DIAM--Modified CAD Geometry and Meshing," date unknown. cited by other . Taylor et al., "Analyse d'une experience clinique d'un implant posterieur amortissant," Rachis Revue de Pathologie Vertebrale, Oct./Nov. 1999, vol. 11, No. 4-5, Gieda Inter Rachis. cited by other . Taylor et al., "Surgical Requirement for the Posterior Control of the Rotational Centers," date unknown. cited by other . Taylor et al., "Technical and Anatomical Considerations for the Placement of a Posterior Interspinous Stabilizer," 2004, pp. 1-10, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee. cited by other . Taylor, "Biomechanical Requirements for the Posterior Control of the Centers of Rotation," Swiss Spine Institute International Symposium: Progress in Spinal Fixation, Jun. 21-22, 2002, pp. 1-2, Swiss Spine Institute, Bern, Switzerland. cited by other . Taylor, "Non-Fusion Technologies of the Posterior Column: A New Posterior Shock Absorber," International Symposium on Intervertebral Disc Replacement and Non-Fusion-Technology, May 3-5, 2001, Spine Arthroplasty. cited by other . Taylor, "Posterior Dynamic Stabilization using the DIAM (Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion)," date unknown, pp. 1-5. cited by other . Taylor, "Presentation a un an d'un dispositif amortissant d'assistance discale," 5emes journees Avances & Controverses en pathologie rachidienne, Oct. 1-2, 1998, Faculte Libre de Medecine de Lille. cited by other . Tsuji et al., "Ceramic Interspinous Block (CISB) Assisted Anterior Interbody Fusion," J. Spinal Disorders, 1990, pp. 77-86, vol. 3, No. 1. cited by other . Vangilder, "Interspinous, Laminar, and Facet Posterior Cervical Bone Fusions," Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 135-146, Ch. 13, Thieme, New York. cited by other . Voydeville et al., "Experimental Lumbar Instability and Artificial Ligament," Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol., Jul. 15, 2000, pp. 167-176, vol. 10. cited by other . Voydeville et al., "Lumbar Instability Treated by Intervertebral Ligamentoplasty with Smooth Wedges," Orthopedie Traumatologie, 1992, pp. 259-264, vol. 2, No. 4. cited by other . Waldemar Link, "Spinal Surgery: Instrumentation and Implants for Spinal Surgery," 1981, Link America Inc., New Jersey. cited by other . Wiltse et al., "The Treatment of Spinal Stenosis," Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Urist, ed., Mar.-Apr. 1976, pp. 83-91, No. 115. cited by other . Wisneski et al., "Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis," Seminars in Spine Surgery, Wiesel, ed., Jun. 1994, pp. 116-123, vol. 6, No. 2. cited by other . Zdeblick et al., "Two-Point Fixation of the Lumbar Spine Differential Stability in Rotation," Spine, 1991, pp. S298-S301, vol. 16, No. 6, Supplement. cited by other . Zucherman et al., "Clinical Efficacy of Spinal Instrumentation in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease," Spine, Jul. 1992, pp. 834-837, vol. 17, No. 7. cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Woodall; Nicholas

---

Parent Case Text

---

This application is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/527,251, filed Mar. 9, 2005 which is a national phase filing of international application no. PCT/FR2003/002635, filed Sep. 3, 2003, which claims priority to French patent application no. 02 11189, filed Sep. 10, 2002, now issued, the contents of each of the foregoing is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

---

Claims

---

The invention claimed is:

1. A posterior vertebral support assembly, comprising: an interspinous wedge configured to be inserted between the spinous processes of two vertebrae, wherein the wedge includes: first and second opposing ends, each shaped to receive the respective spinous processes, first and second lateral sides extending from the first end to the second end, and at least one elastically deformable zone; an elastic, stretchable strap engageable around at least two spinous processes and the wedge while the wedge ends receive the spinous processes; the strap forming a first and a second compressive lateral element disposed on opposing lateral sides of the wedge; the first and second compressive lateral elements being configured to be disposed at a first distance apart when the vertebrae are in extension and at a second distance, less than the first distance, when the vertebrae are in flexion; and first and second lateral transmission elements disposed respectively between the first compressive lateral element and the wedge and the second compressive lateral element and the wedge, the first and second lateral transmission elements being adapted to press against the lateral sides of the wedge substantially midway between the first and second ends in a transverse direction in response to forces applied by the first and second compressive lateral elements when the first and second compressive lateral elements are moved from the first distance apart to the second distance apart; the lateral transmission elements, while the wedge ends receive the spinous processes, not extending through a sagittal plane defined by the spinous processes in the space between the spinous processes.

2. The support assembly of claim 1 wherein the wedge comprises two recesses with each recess bounded by two lugs, the lugs and recesses adapted to cradle their respective spinous processes.

3. A posterior vertebral support assembly, comprising: an interspinous wedge configured to be inserted between the spinous processes of two vertebrae, wherein the wedge includes: first and second opposing ends, each shaped to engage with and to receive the respective spinous processes; first and second lateral sides extending from the first end to the second end; at least one elastically deformable zone; a strap engageable around at least two spinous processes and the wedge, the strap forming a first and a second compressive lateral element disposed on opposing lateral sides of the wedge, the first and second compressive lateral elements being configured to maintain the position of the wedge; first and second lateral transmission elements disposed respectively between the first compressive lateral element and the wedge and the second compressive lateral element and the wedge, the first and second lateral transmission elements being adapted to press against the lateral sides of the wedge substantially midway between the first and second ends in a transverse direction in response to forces applied by the first and second compressive lateral elements; wherein the first and second lateral transmission elements are each a small bar disposed between the compressive lateral elements and the wedge; and wherein each small bar is connected to a support plate configured to transfer force from the lateral transmission elements to the elastically deformable zone, a first end with a saddle-shaped receiver sized to receive and engage a spinous process of a first vertebra; a second end longitudinally opposite the first end with a saddle-shaped receiver sized to receive and engage a spinous process of a second vertebra; a longitudinal axis extending through said saddle-shaped receivers of said first and second ends; an elastically deformable zone between the saddle-shaped receivers; a first lateral side adjacent the deformable zone; a second lateral side adjacent the deformable zone and opposite the first lateral side; the distance between the first and second ends being greater than the distance between the first and second lateral sides; first and second longitudinally extending compressive lateral elements disposed adjacent to the lateral sides of the interspinous wedge, but entirely spaced away therefrom; the compressive lateral elements being deformable between releasing positions and compressive positions and each being sized to extend from the first vertebra to the second vertebra and being shaped to connect to both the first vertebra and the second vertebra.

4. The posterior vertebral support assembly of claim 1 where the wedge further comprises first and second saddle recesses formed on the first and second ends respectively; the wedge further comprising a longitudinal axis extending through the first and second saddle recesses; the lateral transmission elements not extending through the longitudinal axis.

5. The posterior vertebral support assembly of claim 1 wherein the first and second lateral transmission elements are each a small bar disposed between the compressive lateral elements and the wedge.

---

Description

---

The present invention concerns a posterior vertebral support assembly.

In the case of degeneration of the intervertebral disc of two vertebrae and/or of ligament distension, it is known to place a wedge between the spinous processes of the two vertebrae concerned, making it possible to support the vertebrae. In this regard, reference may be made to French Patent Applications Nos. FR 94 03716 and FR 98 02300 tiled in the name of the proprietor of the present application.

The wedges according to these earlier patent applications are connected to the spinous processes of the two treated vertebrae by two independent ligaments, each of the ligaments passing through the wedge and tightly surrounding the corresponding spinous process. In the case of flexion of the spinal column in a forward direction, the spinous processes move away from one another, thereby causing longitudinal stretching of the wedge.

A drawback of this longitudinal stretching is that of stressing the wedge in longitudinal traction. The conditions of exertion of this traction can however be perfected, in particular in order to obtain assisted and contained control of the movement of the vertebrae, inasmuch as the repetition of this traction threatens to affect the durability of the wedge.

The present invention aims to remedy this drawback.

The assembly which it concerns comprises, in a manner known per se, an interspinous wedge configured to be inserted between the spinous processes of two vertebrae to be treated, whereof at least the zone designed to be placed between the spinous processes of the vertebrae is made of an elastically deformable material.

According to the invention, the assembly further comprises:

two compressive lateral elements, designed to be placed on either side of the wedge in the longitudinal direction, the compressive lateral elements being deformable between releasing positions, which they occupy when the vertebrae are in lordosis or when the spinal column is extended, and wherein they are relatively spaced apart from the wedge in the transverse direction, and compressive positions, which they occupy when the spinal column is in flexion, and wherein they are relatively close to the wedge in the transverse direction; and

two lateral transmission elements, placed between the compressive lateral elements and the wedge, configured in order, when the compressive lateral elements are displaced in said compressive position, to press against the wedge in the transverse direction thereof, at the zone of the wedge designed to be placed between the spinous processes of the vertebrae.

The assembly according to the invention thus makes it possible to exert a progressive transverse compression on the wedge during the movement of flexion of the spinal column. This compression will reduce the shear stresses which are exerted on the wedge during intervertebral distancing combining tilting and forward sliding movements, owing to the containment of the displacements effected by the wedge.

The transverse compression of the wedge is preferable to pure longitudinal traction from the point of view of durability of the wedge, since it compensates the stressing of the wedge in the longitudinal direction.

The zone of the wedge designed to be placed between the spinous processes may be made of a material having limit of compressibility in the transverse direction of the wedge, and the assembly may then be configured such that this limit is reached when the treated vertebrae attain a predetermined tilted position.

It is also possible to configure the compressive lateral elements so that the elements have a limit of deformation in the transverse direction, this limit of deformation being reached when the treated vertebrae attain a predetermined tilted position.

The compressive lateral elements may be deformed nonelastically or elastically between said releasing and compressive positions. In the latter case, the return force of the elements to their neutral form contributes to the damping of the tilting movement of the treated vertebrae.

The compressive lateral elements may likewise be elastically deformable in the longitudinal direction of the compressive lateral elements, to the same end.

According to one embodiment of the invention, the compressive lateral elements are independent of one another, and each is connected to one of the treated vertebrae by one end and to the other treated vertebra by its other end. The connection of the ends of the compressive lateral elements to the vertebrae may in particular be effected at the pedicles of the vertebrae, by means of pedicular screws engaged in eyelets or anchorage pieces included in the compressive lateral elements.

The connection of the compressive lateral elements to the vertebrae may also be effected, in the case of the overlying vertebra, by means of the passage of the elements beneath the laminae of that vertebra. This sub-laminal passage makes it possible to preserve the pedicles and to be as central as possible in order, during the longitudinal elongation, to optimize the transverse thrust exerted on the wedge. In the case of the underlying vertebra, these same compressive lateral elements may also be connected to an interpedicular transverse connecting bar, placed in position especially in the case of laminectomy on this vertebra, thus making it possible to reduce the concentration of strains. Similarly, the compressive lateral elements may be connected to a connecting bar joined to a system of arthrodesis of the two underlying vertebrae.

According to another embodiment of the invention, the compressive lateral elements are formed by the two lateral portions of a circular strap engaged round the spinous processes of the two treated vertebrae.

The lateral transmission elements themselves may be constituted by small bars bearing on the one hand against the compressive lateral elements and on the other hand against the wedge, especially via small support plates.

These same lateral transmission elements may likewise be constituted by bosses connected either to the compressive lateral elements or to the wedge. In the latter case, the bosses may be integral with the wedge.

The wedge may be made entirely of an elastically deformable material such as a silicone; it may in particular comprise a core made of such a material and a textile envelope containing the core.

The wedge may also be formed by a band of resilient material, suitably curved.

The wedge may comprise a spring placed transversely at its zone designed to be placed between the spinous processes.

For greater understanding thereof, the invention is described again hereinafter with reference to the appended diagrammatic drawing representing, by way of non-limiting example, several possible embodiments of the assembly concerned.

FIG. 1 is a rear view, very simplified, after the positioning on two vertebrae;

FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1, according to the second embodiment;

FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 1, according to the third embodiment, only the spinous processes of the vertebrae being shown, and

FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIG. 3, according to a variant.

FIG. 1 represents a posterior vertebral support assembly 1 placed in position on two vertebrae 2 affected by degeneration of the disc 3 and/or ligament distension.

The assembly 1 comprises an interspinous wedge 5, two compressive lateral elements 6 and two lateral transmission elements 7.

The wedge 5 is made of an elastically flexible material and comprises two curved recesses 8 allowing it to be inserted between the spinous processes 9 of the two vertebrae 2. It may in particular conform to the wedge according to French Patent Application No. FR 98 02300, that is to say:

comprising a core made of silicone and an envelope made of polyester fabric,

having an interspinous portion 10 having a height greater than the distance separating the spinous processes 9 when the vertebrae 2 are in lordosis in order to be compressed when the wedge 5 is inserted between the processes 9 and to permit relief of the disc 3 and also restoration of the ligaments to functional tension, and

having lugs 11 which bound the curved recesses 8, the lugs 11 broadly enveloping the processes 9 and being self-tightened round the processes 9 when said interspinous portion 10 is compressed.

The wedge 5 shown in FIG. 1 differs, however, from the wedge according to the aforesaid French Patent Application No. FR 98 02300 in that it has domed lateral walls, imparting to it a relatively large width at said interspinous portion 10.

Each element 6 is formed by a lamina 15 made of elastically deformable synthetic material and by two eyelets 16 connected to the ends of the lamina 15. The latter is curved and comprises the element 7 at the median portion of its concave face, the concave face being designed to be turned towards the wedge 5.

The eyelets 16 are designed to receive pedicular screws permitting the anchorage of the elements 6 to the vertebrae 2.

Each element 7 is formed by a small rigid bar 20 fixed to an element 6, and is oriented substantially perpendicularly to the zone of the element 6 to which it is connected. The bar 20 is placed, after implantation, at the interspinous portion 10 of the wedge 5.

Each bar 20 is rigidly connected with a small plate 21 for bearing against the portion 10.

The assembly 1 according to the invention is in the position shown in

FIG. 1 when the vertebrae 2 are in lordosis.

In the case of extension of the spinal column, the vertebrae 2 pivot in a direction in which the processes 9 are brought closer to one another, thereby leading to compression of the wedge 5 up to the limit of elasticity of the material constituting the core of the wedge. A damping of the pivoting movement of the vertebrae 2 is thus obtained as long as said limit of elasticity is not reached, then the arresting of that same movement is obtained when the limit of elasticity is reached. During this compression of the wedge 5, the elements 6 are deformed in the direction in which their curvature is increased, contributing to the damping of the movement of the vertebrae 2. The elements 6 likewise provide a perfect guarantee of maintenance of the position of the wedge 5 between the processes 9.

In the case of flexure of the spinal column, the vertebrae 2 pivot in a direction in which the processes 9 are spaced from each other, thereby leading to a reduction in the curvature of the elements 6. The elements 7 then press against the wedge 5 transversely, thereby also making it possible to dampen the movement of the vertebrae 2 then to arrest that movement when the limit of elasticity of the material forming the core of the wedge 5 is reached and/or when the elements come close to a substantially rectilinear form.

FIG. 2 shows an assembly 1 similar to that just described, except that the elements 6 are formed by the two lateral portions of a circular strap 25 engaged round the processes 9 of the vertebrae 2. The other portions or elements already described, which are to be found again in this second embodiment, are not described again and are designated by the same numerical references as before.

The strap 25 may be made of a slightly elastically stretchable material, and thus also contributes to the damping and then blocking of the pivoting movement of the vertebrae 2 in the case of flexion of the spinal column.

FIGS. 3 and 4 show a third embodiment of the assembly 1, in which the latter is similar to that shown in FIG. 2, except that the small bars 20 and plates 21 are replaced by bosses 30 along which pass the lateral portions of the strap 25. The bosses 30 may be fixed to the wedge 5 or be integral therewith, as shown in FIG. 3, or may be rigidly connected with the strap 25 and bear against the wedge 5, optionally at lateral recesses which the wedge includes to receive them, as shown in FIG. 4.

As it appears from the foregoing, the invention provides a decisive improvement on the prior art, by providing a posterior vertebral support assembly which does not stress the wedge in the longitudinal direction during the movement of flexion of the spinal column. Perfect control of the movement of the vertebrae is obtained by means of this assembly, and the durability of the wedge is not affected by the repeated movements of the vertebrae.

It is self-evident that the invention is not limited to the embodiment described above by way of example, but that on the contrary it encompasses all the variants of embodiment coming within the scope of protection defined by the appended claims.

* * * * *